Sexuality and Normality

In the XNUMXth century, many books on sexuality talked about what was sin and what was not sin. Putting people, couples, how they should relate sexually. If they did otherwise, they would be sinners and frowned upon by society. With this, generating a series of locks with sexuality being individual and as a couple. The next generation of medical treatises published, in addition to a broad practical reading, rules to define what was “normal” and what was “abnormal”. It is enough to call a sexual taste "abnormal" for it to immediately provoke discomfort and anxiety. Wanting to define what is "normal" implies imposing certain rules on sex. In fact, there is a rule. Sex must be a completely satisfaction between two people who love each other, from which both emerge carefree, gratified and prepared for more. This definition includes the realization that there is a big difference between people's needs and their ability to satisfy them, and, in satisfying themselves. ; statistically this difference is greater than in any other measurable case. Now, since sexual activities mean cooperation, lovers help each other, care for each other, admire each other with nonjudgmental surrender and yes, with desire, desire more of yourself and the other.

The sexual act plunges us into an anxiety far superior to that caused by any other difference to our tastes or needs. Our culture has barely emerged from a period of moral panic and we are only now beginning to understand that there is nothing to

fear in sex and yes, a lot to enjoy. Therefore, a large number of people, from the point of view of their sexual opinions, remember that younger generation who were brought up in the belief that sweets had poison, while gelatin was healthy (because it had no taste). These people need to be reassured.

Previous generations were traumatized by the censorship of aunties who banned various appropriate sexual practices, they considered them strange, nefarious and disgusting, when what happened was that they were simply poorly known. The aunties, in fact, were afraid of losing control and not knowing how to lead the youngest ones who had

so much energy and curiosity, natural in childhood. For the older ones, it was easier to frighten and traumatize, unfortunately, they didn't know how to do otherwise.

A few decades ago, the sexologist Krafft-Ebing wrote a manual in which he described as diseases all sexual practices that he himself did not enjoy, including in the text examples taken from the behavior of truly neurotic individuals.

So the church led, together with the manipulative government, castrators of sexuality. People who are sexually dissatisfied, people who do not develop sexual energy are easily manipulated.

The great manipulators knew the potency that sexual energy has, and how much it leads the individual to his autonomy and personal power.

It is customary to consider abnormal what is unusual for the place, time and group. Considering something “abnormal” is one of the forms of mass manipulation: few who allow themselves to get out of the “box”.